Thursday, April 23, 2009

I am concerned and so should you be,,,,

We have a dangerous situation happening in Pakistan.

Pakistan is an US Alli
Pakistan has Nukes.
Pakistan is next door to India that Has Nukes.

The Taliban are attempting to take over Pakistan.

The president of Pakistan is week. He tried to make a deal and well like any group of fascists a deal is not worth the paper it is written on. (Obama Take Note, deals don't work with evil!)

Hopefully our foolish leaders will head what is going on and deal with this issue.
Support the Military in Pakistan they are the only ones that will be able to stop the creep of the Taliban.

Wednesday, April 22, 2009

Jihad Watch

Jihad Watch: "Pakistani jihad leader wants Sharia 'even in America'

kirk_screams_khan.jpg
Khaaaaannnnn!!!!

He said it. And Muslim Khan also mentioned the need to collect jizya payments from the dhimmis.

'TTP says Osama welcome in Swat: Taliban reject peace accord,' from the Daily Times, April 22 (thanks to Block Ness):

MINGORA/LAHORE/NEW DELHI: Swat Taliban have said they are not bound to honour the peace accord between the government and cleric Sufi Muhammad, a private TV channel reported on Tuesday.

According to the channel, they said the NWFP government had signed the deal with Tehreek-e-Nifaz-e-Shariat-e-Muhammadi, and not with the Taliban.

Taliban sharia: Although there was no official confirmation, Taliban spokesman Muslim Khan issued a direct challenge to the legitimacy of Pakistan’s government in a telephone interview with the CNN, by demanding the imposition of the Taliban’s model of sharia throughout Pakistan and beyond, “even in America”.

Disagree: He also denounced any Pakistanis who disagreed with his interpretation of Islam, calling them “non-Muslims”. He also called for the imposition of jiziya, a tax to be levied on all non-Muslims in Pakistan....

As per Qur'an 9:29."

Tuesday, April 21, 2009

Washington Times - EXCLUSIVE: Senator's husband's firm cashes in on crisis

Tuesday, April 21, 2009
Chuck Neubauer (Contact)

EXCLUSIVE:

On the day the new Congress convened this year, Sen. Dianne Feinstein introduced legislation to route $25 billion in taxpayer money to a government agency that had just awarded her husband's real estate firm a lucrative contract to sell foreclosed properties at compensation rates higher than the industry norms.

Mrs. Feinstein's intervention on behalf of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. was unusual: the California Democrat isn't a member of the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs with jurisdiction over FDIC; and the agency is supposed to operate from money it raises from bank-paid insurance payments - not direct federal dollars."

Ret. Adm. Denies Anti-Obama Email

Ret. Adm. Denies Anti-Obama Email
April 21, 2009
Virginian-Pilot

The widely circulated e-mail claims to offer a look inside last week's Navy SEAL rescue of Capt. Richard Phillips from Somali pirates.

The message, credited to retired Rear Adm. Lou Sarosdy, begins, 'Having spoken to some SEAL pals here in Virginia Beach yesterday and asking why this thing dragged out for four days, I got the following...'

It goes on to criticize President Barack Obama for not authorizing the military to act more aggressively during the stand-off, which ended with snipers killing three Somali pirates. The e-mail claims that Obama rejected two proposed rescue plans and that Phillips was saved only after naval officers at the scene decided on their own to proceed."

Thomas Sowell : Are You an "Extremist"? - Townhall.com

Thomas Sowell : Are You an "Extremist"? - Townhall.com:
"While the rest of us may be worried about violent Mexican drug gangs on our border, or about terrorists who are going to be released from Guantanimo, the Director of Homeland Security is worried about 'right-wing extremists.'

Just who are these right-wing extremists?"

Monday, April 20, 2009

Al-Qaeda second banana: "The new President Obama did not change anything of ...

via Jihad Watch by Robert on 4/20/09

ZawahiriBooks.jpg
Not satisfied*

Obama embraces America's enemies and calls them friends, and pursues an aggressive policy of appeasement toward Iran, and Zawahiri is still not satisfied. And that's understandable: in no scenario will he emerge the winner. The Obama Administration appears to be setting up Al-Qaeda to be the fall guy, while a new Era of Peace dawns between the United States and the Vast Majority of Peaceful Muslims. As fanciful as that hope is, it's small wonder that Zawahiri would be trying to regain some market share.

"Al-Qaeda deputy Zawahiri says Muslims not convinced by Barack Obama," by Ben Farmer in the Telegraph, April 20 (thanks to Jeffrey Imm):

Ayman al-Zawahiri, the right-hand man of Osama bin Laden, has said Barack Obama's policies have failed to change Muslim perceptions of America.

The deputy leader of al-Qaeda accused the US of continuing to kill Muslims around the world according to excerpts said to be from a new video statement.

"The new President Obama did not change anything of the image of America towards Muslims and the oppressed," Zawahiri said.

Excerpts from the video were released by SITE Intelligence, a US-based firm monitoring terrorist propaganda.

"It is America that is still killing Muslims in Palestine, Iraq, and Afghanistan," the al-Qaeda's number two continued in the video that was released on Sunday. "It is America that steals their fortunes, occupies their land, and supports the thieving, corrupt, and traitor rulers in their countries," Zawahiri said.

"And consequently, the problem is not over. Rather, it is likely to deteriorate and escalate."

Since his inauguration, President Obama has made determined efforts to rebuild America's reputation in the Muslim world, after years of hostility bred by the Iraq and Afghan conflicts and perceived support for Israel....

Not, you'll notice, bred by the attitudes toward non-Muslims inculcated by the Qur'an and Sunnah. Oh, no. It is all our fault, as always.

However the statement from Zawahiri said: "America came to us with a new face, attempting to fool us with it; a face that calls for change, but to change us, so that we give up our faith and our rights, not to change their crimes, aggressions, thefts, and their scandals."...

*Yes, it's a Photoshop. Just a little joke. Relax.



Torture - Mr. President?

Some to remember about the history of the democratic party..

via Red County by Wayne Perryman on 4/19/09

Torture? I'm so glad you brought up the subject. Mr. President and Attorney General Holder, Conservative African Americans have been waiting a lifetime to have this conversation. But before you and the sensitive members of the Democratic Party start with the Bush Administration, why don't we review the torture tactic of the Democratic Party.

The chronicles of history reveal that in areas controlled by Democrats, Democrats used every form of torture to keep blacks in their place. Lynching, whippings, murder, intimidation, assassinations and mutilations were commonplace in jurisdictions where Democrats were in control. In addition to individual torture entire black communities were destroyed and burned to the ground in such places like: Wilmington, North Carolina, Rosewood, Florida, and the Greenwood District in Tulsa, Oklahoma, to name a few. The one thing that all of these communities had in common, is what realtors often say: location, location, location. They were all located in states and counties controlled by Democratic officials. According to the renowned African American history professor, John Hope Franklin, the atrocities committed against African Americans in these regions, "were so varied and so numerous as to defy classification or enumeration."

The Encyclopaedia Britannica reported that from the beginning, "Democrat resentment [of black freedom and equality under Reconstruction] led to the formation of the secret terroristic organizations such as the Ku Klux Klan and the Knight of the White Camelia. The use of fraud, violence and intimidation helped Southerns... regain control of their state governments, by the time the last federal troops had been withdrawn in 1877, the Democratic Party was back in power."[1]

Other noted history professors also wrote about these atrocities, including:

a. Professor James McPherson of Princeton University

b. Professor David Herbert Donald of Harvard University

c. Professor Allen W. Trelease of North Carolina University

d. Professor Howard O. Lindsey of DePaul University.

Professor Allen Trelease said: "Klansmen in disguise rode through Negro neighborhoods at night warning Negroes either to cast Democratic ballots or stay away from the poll. The Klan also sent notices to Republican office holders, warning them of death and telling them to either resign or leave the vicinity. Similar notices went to active Republicans of both races and often to the teachers of Negro schools as well. Klan activities created a reign of terror in many localities and sometimes had the desired effect of demoralizing Negroes and Republicans…. Republicans of both races were threatened, beaten, shot, and murdered with impunity. In some areas Negroes stopped voting or voted the Democrat ticket as the Klan demanded. "Democrats by a kind of tortured reasoning, sometimes accused Negroes and Republicans of attacking each other so that the crimes would be blamed on the Democrats; investigations revealed that Democrats had committed the acts themselves."

Professors John Hope Franklin and Alfred Moss, authors of From Slavery To Freedom tells us that, "The Camelias and the Klan were the most powerful of the secret orders. Armed with guns, swords, or other weapons, their members patrolled some parts of the South day and night. They used intimidation, force, ostracism in business and society, bribery at the polls, arson, and even murder to accomplish their deed. Depriving the Negro of political equality became, to them, a holy crusade in which a noble end justified any means. Negroes were run out of communities if they disobeyed orders to desist from voting; and the more resolute and therefore insubordinate blacks were whipped, maimed, and hanged. In 1871 several Negro officials in South Carolina were given fifteen days to resign and they were warned that if they failed to do so, then retributive justice will as surely be used as night follows day. For many white Southerners violence was still the surest means of keeping the Negroes politically impotent, and in countless communities they were not allowed, under penalties of reprisals, to show their faces in town on Election Day. It had looked as though the Civil War would break out anew as the Democrats resorted to every possible device to over throw the radicals.64

Professor Franklin went on to say, "It was reported that in North Carolina the Klan was responsible for 260 outrages, including 7 murders and the whipping of 72 whites and 141 Negroes. In one county in South Carolina 6 men were murdered and more than 300 were whipped during the first six months of 1870. The personal indignities inflicted upon individual white and Negroes were so varied and so numerous as to defy classification or enumeration."[2]

In his book, The Abolitionist Legacy, Professor James McPherson reported, "In 1873, Louisiana became almost a synonym for chaos and violence. When Grant sent federal troops to install Kellogg in office [as governor], Louisiana Democrats were infuriated. They formed White Leagues which attacked black and white Republicans and took scores of lives."[3]

From his book entitled; Charles Sumner, Harvard Professor, David Hebert Donald reached the following conclusion: "Congress could give the Negro the vote, but all over the South the Ku Klux Klan and other terrorist organizations systematically intimidated the freedmen, flogged or slaughtered their leaders and drove whites who worked with them into exile. Congress could require federal troops to supervise the registration of voters, but Negroes were waylaid and butchered on the roads to the registration offices. Congress could suppress outright violence by military force, but it could do nothing to protect Negroes from landlords who told them bluntly: If you vote with that Yankee [Republican] party you shall not live on our land."[4]

Professor Howard O. Linsay, the author of, A History of Black Americans says, "Blacks and sympathetic Whites were attacked and threatened. African Americans were discouraged from seeking elected office and even from trying to vote. Any and all means were used from threats to violence to outright murder."[5]

The following is what happened to Sam Hose and Mary Turner:

After a mob murdered Mary Turner's husband, she threatened to swear out warrants against his killers. Several hundred men decided to teach her a lesson. They took this eight month pregnant woman from her home and after tying her ankles together, they hung her from a tree, head downward, dousing her clothes with gasoline, and burned them [the clothes] from her body. While she was still alive, someone used a knife ordinarily reserved for splitting hogs to cut open the woman's abdomen. The baby fell from her womb to the ground and cried briefly, whereupon a member of the mob crushed the baby's head beneath his heel. Then hundreds of bullets were fired into Mary Turner's body." [Page 14, Without Sanctuary – Foreword written by Democratic Congressman John Lewis].

These forms of torture were common in regions controlled by Democrats. The following is what they did to Sam Hose after falsely accusing him.

"After stripping Hose of his clothes and chaining him to a tree, the self-appointed executioners stacked kerosene-soaked wood high around him. Before saturating Hose with oil and applying the torch, they cut off his ears, fingers, and genitals, and skinned his face. While some in the crowd plunged knives into the victims flesh, others watched with unfeigning satisfaction, the contortions of Sam Hose's body as flames rose, distorting his features, causing his eyes to bulge out of their sockets and rupturing his veins. The only sounds that came from the victim's lips, even as his blood sizzled in the fire. were, "Oh my God! Oh, Jesus." Before Hose's body had even cooled, his heart and liver were removed and cut into several pieces and his bones were crushed into small particles. The crowd fought over these souvenirs. Shortly after the lynching, one of the participants reportedly left for the state capitol, hoping to deliver a slice of Sam Hose's heart to the Democratic governor of Georgia, who would call Sam Hose's deeds, "the most diabolical in the annals of crime." [Page 15, 'Without Sanctuary"]

After the brutal hanging, it was proven that Mr. Hose was innocent of the allege charges. They took parts of his body and displayed them in store windows, which was a common practice in towns, cities, counties and states controlled by Democrats.

I haven't even scratched the surface. Time and space would not permit me to tell you about Dred Scott, the Civil Rights Cases of 1883, Plessy v. Ferguson, the Senate investigations of 1871, or the letters written by blacks in Kentucky in 1871 Louisiana in 1872, Alabama in 1874. From the New York riots of during the Civil War, to 1963 when the 16th Street Baptist Church was bombed as Condoleezza Rice was preparing to go to Sunday School, wherever Democrats were in control, blacks have been tortured, intimidated and mutilated by Democrat officials and members of the Democratic Party. Senator Tillman of South Carolina said lynching blacks was justified. He went on to say: "Southern women will not submit to the black man gratifying his lust on our wives and daughter without lynching him." This same Democratic Senator said: "We reorganized the Democratic Party with one plank and only one plank, namely that this is a white man's country and white men must govern it."

Now tell me Mr. President and Mr. Holder, how many detainees were beaten, hung, raped, cut into pieces bombed and burned to death under Bush Administration? Before we start condemning the Bush Administration for their handling of the allege terrorist from foreign countries, why don't we first review the Democratic Party who tortured the black citizens from their own country. Oh, one more thing. Mr. Holder, it was the Bush Administration that finally prosecuted the person that was responsible for the 16th Baptist Church bombing. Black conservatives are looking forward to hearings on torture.


[1] 1992 Encyclopaedia Britannica pp. 979

64 Reconstruction – The Great Experience, pp. 226-233

[2] Reconstruction After The Civil War, p. 157

[3] The Abolitionist Legacy, p.40

[4] Charles Sumner, p. 420

[5] A History of Black Americans, pp. 88-89

*Home page photo courtesy of Flickr user, ray(rayphua)